Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Litarodi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tawker (talk) 21:32, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Litarodi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG and since the article asserts them as being a rapper by trade, they fail WP:MUSICBIO by a country mile. The article was tagged for speedy deletion by three different users including, RHaworth and Flat Out with each tag being declined by the same non-admin user. STATic message me! 20:05, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm thinking of WP:BIO here, not WP:MUSICBIO. The article certainly needs work to steer it away from portraying him as a notable musician. But as the bio section already notes, he dropped his idea of a career in music for its own sake years ago, and his career is focused on missionary work. Cross Rhythms, for example, is a Christian evangelism media group, and promotes music as ministry rather than by overall popularity or chart success. I'll try to find some more sources. Ruby Murray 21:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Ruby Murray 21:22, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Ruby Murray 21:22, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Ruby Murray 21:22, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.